tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post3732312428343640594..comments2024-01-23T16:53:02.428+00:00Comments on Mark Thompson: Top 20 Lib Dem "influencers" on TwitterMark Thompsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00744387583593537268noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-18406906437275671792010-04-18T10:37:06.291+01:002010-04-18T10:37:06.291+01:00Hmmm. I have a Tweetlevel score of 32, which shoul...Hmmm. I have a Tweetlevel score of 32, which should make me 17th on that list, and I'm not that big a Lib Dem...<br /><br />Someone should really build a tool that will put everyone through tweet level with a key word in their Profile Information, like "Lib Dems", or "lawyer" and so on. Be pretty easy to knock up rankings after that.Sarah McCullochhttp://www.sarahmcculloch.com/blog/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-6693206978930453852010-01-28T15:44:42.058+00:002010-01-28T15:44:42.058+00:00No, give it to me straight. I can take it.
I don&...<em>No, give it to me straight. I can take it.</em><br /><br />I don't believe you.James Graham (Quaequam Blog!)https://www.blogger.com/profile/00319089107820032874noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-56826484574914213772010-01-28T15:41:47.350+00:002010-01-28T15:41:47.350+00:00OK so I score 30. OK. But "Your trust score (...OK so I score 30. OK. But "Your trust score (16.6) is low because the content that you tweet is either not credible, interesting or newsworthy."<br /><br />No, give it to me straight. I can take it.Joe Ottenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18380362092159905533noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-2406415028467673002010-01-27T09:32:51.156+00:002010-01-27T09:32:51.156+00:00"Of course this approach has a big problem.&q..."Of course this approach has a big problem."<br /><br />Yup, Lembit Opik still featuring on a list of 'influential' Lib Dems is indeed a problem.Letters From A Toryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14612766550608940053noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-88141123941734863162010-01-26T23:11:53.757+00:002010-01-26T23:11:53.757+00:00Another prime example of Glenn's Law of Mathem...Another prime example of Glenn's Law of Mathematics where you draw up a list of size N and the Stephen Glenn position will be N+1Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01143865296905244397noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-76023768026860570222010-01-26T21:38:07.205+00:002010-01-26T21:38:07.205+00:00I wonder if we could get "the Stephen Glenn p...I wonder if we could get "the Stephen Glenn position" into general usage...Mark Packhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17596137350950820090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-289779534485071922010-01-26T21:36:17.407+00:002010-01-26T21:36:17.407+00:00Oi! Dr Packula as you well know I tweet while out ...Oi! Dr Packula as you well know I tweet while out and about campaigning. This evening being the most recent example.<br /><br />I'm sure if you did put in the effort to put Lib Dem Tweeters it would have to be a Stephen Glenn position -1 listing ;)Stephen Glennhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03027718551675624433noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-892012354071647412010-01-26T18:17:43.931+00:002010-01-26T18:17:43.931+00:00Woohoo! I, El_Cuervo, am more influential that Vi...Woohoo! I, El_Cuervo, am more influential that Vince Cable (44.2)!<br /><br />Sadly I'm unpopular (34.3) and untrustworthy (37.3), but we can't have everything.Matthttp://www.twitter.com/el_cuervonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-84520127832534908702010-01-26T17:46:50.755+00:002010-01-26T17:46:50.755+00:00Actually, this looks not too bad an approach, allo...Actually, this looks not too bad an approach, allowing for - as you say - only having put 20 names in to it.<br /><br />It seems to me reasonable that you're up near top of list as you quite often exchange messages back and forth with a wide range of people on Twitter (not just usual Lib Dem suspects).<br /><br />If putting all the people on LD tweets in is to much work, how about parcelling it out amongst a few volunteers?Mark Packhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17596137350950820090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-74996974219679403842010-01-26T17:43:17.531+00:002010-01-26T17:43:17.531+00:00My score is 43. I didn't realise I was almost ...My score is 43. I didn't realise I was almost as influential as Dr Vince, but you can't argue with the numbers.<br /><br />No, you can't.Duncan Stotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03130729454177705599noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-84056213665728873492010-01-26T17:00:10.078+00:002010-01-26T17:00:10.078+00:00And of course Mark we already know how active you ...And of course Mark we already know how active you are on twitter - so surely that must have to be taken into account when compared to someone with lots of followers who never tweets. How many tweets are you up to now?Jonathan Sheppardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10238183487590130264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-62940981625531696652010-01-26T16:58:05.902+00:002010-01-26T16:58:05.902+00:00What are you on about. Of course Im just as influe...What are you on about. Of course Im just as influential as Nick Clegg ;o)Jonathan Sheppardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10238183487590130264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-79024524524945507382010-01-26T16:48:05.208+00:002010-01-26T16:48:05.208+00:00With my score of 51, I appear to be sandwiched bet...With my score of 51, I appear to be sandwiched between Andrew Reeves and Lynne Featherstone.<br /><br />The list is ridiculous. Some of those MPs don't even tweet (Lembit?).James Graham (Quaequam Blog!)https://www.blogger.com/profile/00319089107820032874noreply@blogger.com