tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post1011090961544500931..comments2024-01-23T16:53:02.428+00:00Comments on Mark Thompson: Ed Balls' trap for Andrew RawnsleyMark Thompsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00744387583593537268noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-79933257687608769092010-02-28T16:00:25.506+00:002010-02-28T16:00:25.506+00:00By their deeds shall ye know them.
See http://ale...By their deeds shall ye know them.<br /><br />See http://alexmasterley.blogspot.com/2010/02/brown-starts-fightback.html<br /><br />This is all proof that Rawnsley is reporting it correct: Brown is an unpleasant bully.<br /><br />There is something disgracefully shabby and cowardly about bullying junior staff who feel they cannot reply.Cardinal Richelieu's molehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07355424371874064362noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3881762807913180318.post-13057497446773101292010-02-28T14:11:43.689+00:002010-02-28T14:11:43.689+00:00Gosh, and how many times has Ed Balls had to defen...Gosh, and how many times has Ed Balls had to defend Gordon Brown? The PM must be *really* guilty.<br /><br />Oh, I'd forgotten Labour's new definition of the Rule of Law: to be accused is to be guilty, except for all Labour people who are by definition pure (and against whom any attacks are proof of the accuser's guilt).Alex Wilcockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03364653159038708678noreply@blogger.com