As can be seen from the footage there were a lot of people who were turned away, even some Conservative activists. It seems that although the meeting was billed as "All Welcome", they were turning people away on the grounds that there was "not enough room". You can also see that when some people identified themselves as Conservatives who Bill had invited, they were ushered in and the line became "You can't come in unless Bill invited you".
I suspect that Mr Wiggin learned from Andrew MacKay’s experience here in Bracknell. I attended MacKay’s meeting and it was a bloodbath. At that meeting that was open to all constituents held in a very large hall (400 odd people were there I estimated) I would say that 80% – 90% of the attendees were against him and there were at least 2 people who filmed the whole thing.
Mr MacKay's meeting was on the 22nd May. The next day he was forced to announce he was standing down at the next election by David Cameron. Mr Wiggin's meeting was a few days later on the 27th May. I suspect that Mr Wiggin saw what happened with MacKay and decided to pick a venue that was far too small and also to do his best to only let Conservative supporters in. The only footage of him available seems to be of him making a statement to camera unchallenged by anyone. I bet MacKay wishes he had been able to rig his meeting like that now.
I spoke to Lucy Hurds, the Lib Dem parliamentary candidate for the newly formed North Herefordshire constituency earlier today that Mr Wiggin would be defending at the next election following boundary changes. She was distinctly unimpressed with the way he has conducted himself and finds it hard to understand why David Cameron has chosen to stand by him. She has called on Mr Wiggin to resign in a letter today.
I know I said that I wanted to move on from the MPs expenses story but I feel very strongly that Bill Wiggin should not be allowed to get away with this. He is clearly terrified of what will happen if he holds a proper public meeting. David Cameron should make him hold another meeting that is genuinely open to all. And if following this it is clear that his position is untenable then he should stand down.
Hattip to Guido for originally drawing my attention to the Youtube clip.
UPDATE: Here is a link to the original Telegraph story on Mr Wiggin's expenses and here is some coverage from the local Hereford Times about it. They also think he still has some explaining to do. Thanks to Lucy for the links.
"Public Meeting - All Welcome"
ReplyDeleteThen this trougher's cronies are turning away people that might give him a difficult reception.
Barely surprised.
I agree. A proper meeting should be held. Over to you, Mr Cameron
ReplyDeleteWonder if there is more to it.
ReplyDeleteWhatever you think of Peter Hitchens, he gets stuck into 'New Tory'.
Google 'Peter Hitchens Witney meeting'.
This article is an eery echo of the Wiggin meeting, but held by D Cameron 4 days before in his own constituency. I think there's a serious possibility that - as the expenses scandal broke - they decided on a party line to hold stage managed "Open Meetings".
The D Cameron meet was according to Hitchens not filmed.
The Wiggin meeting was not meant to be (they allowed no journalists in to the meet at all) & I personally found that footage now on Guido Fawkes purely by accident.
Similarities in Cameron's 'open' meeting and his Eton mate Wiggin's 'open' meeting? I really don't think we are talking coincidence here...
Jim Miller
Leominster
Bill Wiggin constituent
Interesting point Jim.
ReplyDeleteI don't really know about Cameron's meeting but there do seems to be parallels as you say.
At Andrew MacKay's meeting they were trying to prevent cameras coming in but they did not succeed and I think this is ultimately what led to him standing down at the next election. The footage laid bare the true feelings of the constituents.
What is your take on the feeling in Leominster in general about Mr Wiggin and his conduct?
Mark,
ReplyDeleteLeominster is one of the seriously Conservative seats in the country.
BUT!
We are forming an Independent group to challenge Wiggin this or next year.
We think we have a slight chance to do what Richard Taylor did in neighbouring Kidderminster last time.
If we get an Indie candidate to give Bill W a run, we would certainly be asking Libdem and Labour candidates to stand aside: last election Wiggin got 52% of the whole vote, so only one resistance candidate is possible!Jim
Leominster
PS:
ReplyDeleteMore on the shennanigans in Leominster, including possibly electorally illegal behaviour by Bill Wiggin, is here:
http://www:yourconvenience.org.uk
Whoever woulda thought sleepy Leominster would get on the internet news??
JM
Leo.
Oops!
ReplyDeleteI meant:
http://www.yourconvenience.org.uk
Jim